Author: philmullan

Trump is hardly the West’s only trade warrior

philmullan Creative destruction, Economic growth, Geopolitics, State intervention, Trade

Enough of the hyperbole about Trump’s tariffs. His tariffs are wrong, but so is the rest of the west’s obsession with Trump-driven trade wars. For a start the hysteria over Trump’s tariffs ignores, and distracts, from just how protectionist most mature economies have become. Protectionism in its many forms impedes the domestic business investments needed for productivity growth. And the parallel fear-mongering about a ‘trade war’ is clouding the bigger geopolitical, as well as the economic issues, at stake today.

Read the full article here.

The myth of America’s economic exceptionalism

philmullan Economic growth, Economic policy, Productivity, State intervention, The longest depression

What sort of economy is the returning president Donald Trump inheriting? In otherwise polarised and uncertain times, a consensus stands out: the belief in US economic exceptionalism. America’s recent growth out-performance and its ever-climbing equity markets seem to make the country the exception to economic stagnation across the west. But America’s underlying productive decay is not that different to the other mature industrialised nations. The staying power of the narrative of ‘US exceptionalism’ points not to the US’s exceptional vigour but rather to some peculiar forces for resilience in the face of its long-running productive decline. These US-specific factors reveal America’s superior capacity to offset its moribund tendencies.

Read the article here.

We cannot regulate our way to growth

philmullan Economic growth, Economic policy, Politics, State intervention

Even before this week’s bond market turmoil, the newish Labour government tacitly acknowledged that not all was going to plan, with the economy continuing to stagnate. Over the Christmas period, in an apparent act of desperation, UK prime minister Keir Starmer, chancellor Rachel Reeves and business secretary Jonathan Reynolds wrote a letter to the UK’s biggest regulators to ask for help with its growth plan. Regulatory bodies such as energy watchdog Ofgem, water regulator Ofwat, the Environment Agency and the Financial Conduct Authority were urged by the government to submit proposals on how best to boost the economy.

Of course, government ministers should always be engaging with their functionaries for advice. But to openly admit they have had to beseech them for help to meet their central policy commitment of ‘growth, growth, growth’ was an extraordinary testament to Labour’s lack of ideas.

We shouldn’t hold our breath waiting for Starmer’s administration to deliver on his pledge to get rid of regulation ‘where it is needlessly holding back the investment we need to take our country forward’. The reality is that his government, like its predecessors, will only add more to the regulatory burden. Indeed, Labour’s manifesto explicitly promised tougher systems of regulation on a huge spread of businesses.

Read the full article here.

The myth of the population time bomb

philmullan Demographic change, Economic growth, Productivity

In Britain and most other countries today, the birth rate has fallen below replacement levels – usually defined as 2.1 babies per woman. Fertility in Britain first fell below replacement levels in about 1973, and since 2010 has fallen steadily to about 1.55 babies per woman.

These trends are now prompting a lot of doom-laden commentary from demographers, economists and politicians. They claim that an ageing population, with ever-fewer working-age people supporting ever-more retirees, is creating an unsustainable burden for society.

The irony is that such alarmism about ageing and low fertility is aggravating the very anxieties and uncertainties that are contributing to falling birth rates. Thus, it is important to dispel the misconceptions and myths about ageing populations.

We take three here: that falling fertility leads to economic impoverishment; that we are running out of people; and that changing age-dependency ratios are too much to bear.

Read the full article here.

‘More EU’ won’t save Europe’s economy

philmullan Creative destruction, European Union, Politics, State intervention, Zombie economy

Mario Draghi’s report on the future of European competitiveness, published last month may present itself as a sober economic analysis, complete with proposed policy solutions. But this report – commissioned by the EU and produced by a former head of the European Central Bank – is best understood as a political manifesto for an ever-closer EU, controlled from Brussels.

His report is chiefly concerned with ‘strengthening governance’ – a euphemism for the extension of the European Commission’s power. Stronger governance, he writes, ‘means “more Europe” where it really matters’. And this means less national sovereignty where it really matters, too.

Read the full article here.