State intervention

‘More EU’ won’t save Europe’s economy

philmullan Creative destruction, European Union, Politics, State intervention, Zombie economy

Mario Draghi’s report on the future of European competitiveness, published last month may present itself as a sober economic analysis, complete with proposed policy solutions. But this report – commissioned by the EU and produced by a former head of the European Central Bank – is best understood as a political manifesto for an ever-closer EU, controlled from Brussels.

His report is chiefly concerned with ‘strengthening governance’ – a euphemism for the extension of the European Commission’s power. Stronger governance, he writes, ‘means “more Europe” where it really matters’. And this means less national sovereignty where it really matters, too.

Read the full article here.

Unshackling Europe’s Economy: what holds us back?

philmullan Creative destruction, European Union, Politics, Productivity, State intervention

Here is a video of the talk I gave at the conference ‘Unshackling Europe’s Economy: what holds us back?’, organised by MCC Brussels on 24 September 2024.

My talk critiqued Mario Draghi’s recent report, The future of European competitiveness – A competitiveness strategy for Europe. I explained that this is not a neutral report on economic policy with new ideas to boost productivity within European countries. Rather it is a political manifesto motivating an ever-closer European Union controlled from Brussels. Europe’s real productivity slump is used as another instance of a ‘crisis’ – in Draghi’s words, an ‘existential challenge’ – in order to justify extending the powers of the EU to the detriment of national sovereignty and decision-making.

Labour and the Tories are wedded to a failed status quo

philmullan Creative destruction, Economic policy, Productivity, State intervention, Zombie economy

All of Britain’s mainstream political parties continue to support the stagnant economic status quo. They propose policies that will keep lower-performing businesses on publicly funded life support. And they continue to shy away from the root-and-branch restructuring that’s needed to get the UK economy growing again.

There is barely a cigarette paper between Labour and the Conservatives on the economy. The truth is that neither of their two near-identical approaches can fix Britain’s economic malaise. In the name of ‘security’ and ‘stability’, Labour and the Tories both aspire to preserve things as they are. Their aversion to risk will discourage the transformative change that our economy desperately needs.

Read the full article here.

Does the OBR run this country?

philmullan Democracy, Economic policy, Politics, State intervention , ,

The UK desperately needed something bold and innovative from this week’s spring budget. The nation’s infrastructure is literally crumbling, the energy grid is overloaded and local authorities are going bankrupt. The economy and public services are simply not working.

Of course, it would have been naive in the extreme to expect any answers to these problems from the current moribund Tory government – even as a General Election looms. And, given the UK’s stagnant economy, any chancellor would have struggled to conjure up the resources to fix all of this now in a single budget. Still, chancellor Jeremy Hunt’s budget was a paltry affair, even by his past standards.

Some have blamed the paucity of the chancellor’s budget statement on the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the ‘independent’ watchdog that determines whether the chancellor is sticking to his so-called fiscal rules.

But we should be wary of demonising the messenger. And any suggestion of ‘external’ constraints on the government should be rebuffed, as it lets our elected leaders shirk responsibility for their own decisions.

Read the full article here.

Why industrial policy isn’t working

philmullan Creative destruction, Economic growth, Economic policy, Politics, State intervention

There can be good reasons for governments to pursue a so-called industrial policy – that is, a policy that sustains or develops certain industries in order to achieve national goals. In less developed countries, an industrial policy can help develop foundational industries, such as energy or food production. In developed countries, a government might pursue an industrial policy during wartime, providing financial assistance to armaments producers.

But in Britain today, there are several compelling reasons for not pursuing an industrial policy. Excessive corporate welfare is sucking the dynamism out of the UK economy. As things stand, government efforts to shape and direct industry are slowing growth, encouraging corporations to depend on state handouts and distracting from the core role of the state in providing decent public services and infrastructure.

Read the full article here.